記事の内容はjust so you know 意味を明確にします。 just so you know 意味について学んでいる場合は、ShibaHirokazuこの記事Why Gravity is NOT a Forceでjust so you know 意味について学びましょう。

Why Gravity is NOT a Force新しいアップデートのjust so you know 意味に関連する内容の概要

下のビデオを今すぐ見る

このShiba Hirokazu Webサイトでは、just so you know 意味以外の知識を更新して、より価値のあるデータを自分で更新できます。 ウェブサイトshiba-hirokazu.comで、私たちはいつもあなたのために毎日新しい正確な情報を更新します、 あなたにとって最も正確な価値を提供したいと思っています。 ユーザーが最も詳細な方法でインターネット上に情報を追加できます。

just so you know 意味に関連するいくつかの内容

一般相対性理論によれば、重力は力ではなく、重力場は存在しません。 オブジェクトは、曲がった時空をまっすぐに移動する傾向があります。 このビデオを後援してくれた Lutron の Caséta に感謝します。 詳細については、こちらをご覧ください: このビデオについて何時間にもわたってコンサルティングを行ってくれた Geraint Lewis 教授に心から感謝し、これらのアイデアを自分の頭の中でまっすぐに理解することができました。 彼の YouTube チャンネル: または彼の著書: Jonny Hyman による素晴らしい VFX、合成、編集 Ivy Tello による 2D アニメーション Steven Warren と Raquel Nuno による撮影 レビューとスクリプトの相談について Petr Lebedev に感謝します Jonny Hyman による音楽と Epidemic Sound からの音楽Goodnight and Co. が作成したロケット。Geoff Barrett によるロケットのスクリーン画像 BPS.Space の Joe Barnard によるスローモーション ロケット排気映像

続きを見る  《披荆斩棘2》初舞台-上:32位哥哥集结 一代成员惊喜回归 滚烫开启新篇章!Call me by Fire S2 EP1-1丨HunanTV | alt 先生 手紙に関連するすべてのコンテンツ

一部の写真はjust so you know 意味に関する情報に関連しています

Why Gravity is NOT a Force
Why Gravity is NOT a Force

読んでいるWhy Gravity is NOT a Forceに関するニュースを表示することに加えて、shiba-hirokazu.comを継続的に公開する他のトピックを検索できます。

ニュースの詳細はこちら

just so you know 意味に関連する提案

#Gravity #Force。

続きを見る  【アニメ】事前に聞いた苦手な食べ物出して、克服させようとしてくるレストラン | 苦手 な 食べ物 英語に関する情報の概要が最も正確です

veritasium,science,physics,Gravity,general relativity,geodesic,spacetime,curved,weightless,Einstein,light,happiest thought,rocket,space,astronaut,Lutron caseta,lutron caseta switch,caseta wireless,caseta switch,lutron dimmer,lutron smart switch。

Why Gravity is NOT a Force。

just so you know 意味。

just so you know 意味のコンテンツがShiba Hirokazu更新されることで、あなたに価値をもたらすことを望んで、より多くの情報と新しい知識を持っているのに役立つことを願っています。。 shiba-hirokazu.comのjust so you know 意味についての知識をご覧いただきありがとうございます。

21 thoughts on “Why Gravity is NOT a Force | 最も関連性の高いコンテンツjust so you know 意味をカバーしました

  1. Veritasium says:

    Here's a question I've seen a lot in comments: OK, I'm accelerating up but then shouldn't someone on the other side of the globe fall off? No, here's why:
    Either watch again from 8:28 or read what I've written below…

    Spacetime is curved – it curves the opposite direction on the other side of the Earth. 

    Neither us on this side of the Earth nor they on the other side are changing our spacial coordinates – we're not moving up, they're not moving down – Earth isn't flying into one of us.

    BUT we both ARE accelerating. In curved spacetime you have to accelerate just to remain stationary.

    The traditional definition of acceleration is something changing its velocity.

    In general relativity you have to embrace a new definition of acceleration: it means deviating from a geodesic – not going on a straight line path through spacetime. Near the Earth a geodesic is a parabola so unless you're moving in a parabolic arc (like on a zero-g plane) you are accelerating.

    This definition is the same as the old one  so if you're accelerating in deep space then your velocity is changing.

    *BUT*… if you are near a large mass you are in curved spacetime, now acceleration  your velocity is changing. You can stay stationary relative to Earth's surface and still be accelerating. This is because your acceleration should be measured not relative to the Earth's surface but relative to free-falling objects – they are inertial observers.

    Imagine this – I'm in deep space and I make horizontal rows and rows of stationary golf balls. Then I hop in my rocket and accelerate up through them. Just think about what that looks like. Now my rocket is back on Earth just sitting there. I freeze time for a sec and make horizontal rows and rows of golf balls up into the atmosphere. Now unfreeze time. What do you see? If you just look at the golf balls and the rocket ship it looks the same as the situation in space where the golf balls were stationary and the rocket was accelerating. Einstein's point was the golf balls have the better claim as the "stationary" thing since their experience is just like the golf balls in deep space – no forces experienced. The rocket on Earth is just like the rocket in space. It feels a force and hence an acceleration.

  2. Matt Snider says:

    I just found your channel and I've binged like a dozen videos straight, lol. Thank you for this amazing content.

  3. Md.Shamim Reza says:

    Theory of Relativity strongly established by Einstein. Nothing is absulute but relative. The concept of Gravitational Force from Aistotole is wrong relative to the theory of Newton, Newton's theory of Gravitational force is wrong relative to Einstein's theory. So is Einstein is only absolute? Newton's concept of Gravitational Force is more accurate than Einstein. Had Newton lived he could give the solutions of the controversy. All the observation supports Newton's concept of Gravitational Force…

  4. it's mesiiiiiiiiii says:

    In case, the charge have to release electro magnetic waves it have to vibrate back and forth not only forth or not only back

  5. JaykTheJackal says:

    Funny how Euclid's parallel postulate led to the observation that gravitational force doesn't exist.

  6. Erroneus Thyme says:

    If there was ZERO motion…. would there be zero gravity? Or is that question ridiculous…. because (how the F~~~… would we know?) But is the experience of gravity as we know it…. 100% dependent on motion…. and if it is, does that tell us literally ANYTHING at ALL…. about the nature of the universe?

  7. phoenixsplash135 says:

    I've tried but my brain still can't handle it.
    Is it that: Gravity isn't a force so we wouldn't label it on a freebody diagram. So a person falling (ignoring air resistance etc) has no forces acting on them.
    If i was standing underneath that falling person, I would have the normal force acting on me upwards (Also how does normal force exist without gravity?) so I would be accelerating towards them?

  8. Bert Kosier says:

    Also, you are not at rest on the surface of the earth. You are traveling at 67,000 miles per hour (velocity of the Earth traveling through space).

  9. Bert Kosier says:

    Let me ask a question: If a mass was in space with a velocity of zero what is the gravity associated to the mass? It has no momentum or inertia. Does it have a space-time displacement?

  10. Jerry Richmond says:

    So, gravity is just an illusion, huh? Doesn't seem that way when I step on the scale at my doctor's office. 🤪

  11. Pedro Carvalho says:

    Is that why black holes warp light?? Because they have the strongest gravitational force known to us

  12. Line Livin’ says:

    What if light bends due to the electromagnetic fields around the earth and the sun? Tesla said not to believe shias that want to mesmerize you with infinite numbers that cant be explained. He said gravity didn’t exist. To understand the universe you must understand electromagnetism. Just like passing a frequency through water or sand. It creates many shapes that are found in nature.

  13. J. Garris says:

    Whoa, okay so do not try and bend the spoon 🥄. That's impossible. You'll see that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself 🤯.

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 が付いている欄は必須項目です